PlentyOfPlenty

Things I like. I reblog

Anonymous asked: Toi qui reçois beaucoup de messages de filles, réponds à mes questions si tu l'oses : pourquoi les filles d'aujourd'hui sont si facile, si facilement impressionnable, pourquoi elles se laissent si facilement avoir ? Je recherche désespéramment une femme qui se respecte, qui ne se donne pas à n'importe qui qui insiste deux secondes... Penses-tu qu'elles existent encore ?


Answer:

egalitariste:

etsicetaitmavie:

etblablablah:

kradify:

Deux mille cinq cent ans après Périclès, certains ont encore du mal avec la notion de démocratie. Je te rappelle le concept, chacun fait, fait, fait, c’qu’il lui plait, plait, plait, dans la limite des lois votées par la majorité. De même qu’il existe un droit naturel des peuples à disposer de leur propre destin, de même cette notion peut être étendue à chaque individu d’une communauté vivant sur un pied d’égalité. Dans ce cadre, le concept « se donner à n’importe qui » me parait complètement archaïque, dans le sens où il ne saurait constituer l’aune d’un jugement de valeur pour une femme libre. En résumé, qu’elle reste chaste toute sa vie ou qu’elle possède mille amants, W.T.F. ? Et la meilleure façon de se respecter n’est-elle pas d’abord de faire ce qui nous plait ? La sexualité n’est pas un critère moral, c’est l’expression d’un modèle coercitif d’une domination de classe genrée. Les filles d’aujourd’hui ont juste la possibilité d’être aussi « faciles » que les hommes l’ont toujours été, retour du balancier. Ton discours, certes soft, porte un nom en version hard : le slut shaming.

Cette réponse…!!!

quand parfaite cette réponse !!!!!

image

— 5 hours ago with 334 notes

adorlng-fan:

scaryghoultrash:

parallel lives

#why does humanity destroy that which it doesnt understand

(via lulubleurk)

— 5 hours ago with 59966 notes

devilthrones:

"For one thing, there’s Dido’ fetishization by the two Ashford brothers. While one brother sees her simply as an exotic "other" whom he can bed without forming attachments — very different from the attitude toward white women of the same time period, whose virtue was unequivocal and untouchable — the other is downright violent in his conception of Dido, calling her "repulsive" but still expressing a desire to rape her. The scenes in which that older, more violent Ashford brother addresses Dido directly, giving voice to his unbridled racism and at one point assaulting her, are indisputably disturbing, not just because they represent a disgusting and brutal history but because I see remnants of those attitudes today in the way the world perceives the bodies of black and brown women: exotic, sexual, sensual, different objects. We see it in the way Miley Cyrus and almost any given white pop star (Justin Timberlake and Robin Thicke, for example) use black women’s bodies as props in music videos: as something to be appropriated and used for one’s own pleasure and then cast off in pursuit of the next trend. In addition, the rape of black women still does not seem to carry much horror in 2014; it was most recently a punchline on Saturday Night Live, and last year Russell Simmons was forced to apologize for his highly offensive "Harriet Tubman Sex Tape." None of this is too different from the way the Ashford brothers perceive Dido’s body: as an exotic "other" not worthy of love or respect but merely of lust, and lust framed in a particularly problematic racism."

 Belle: A Lesson in the Timelessness of Racism and Misogyny Against Black Women by Olivia Cole 

(via lulubleurk)

— 5 hours ago with 6820 notes

sourcedumal:

So where all the white folks who talk about how rap dont talk about the issues?

Yall betta reblog the fuck outta this

(Source: cartoonsandcheerios, via lulubleurk)

— 5 hours ago with 18289 notes
stammsternenstaub:

m-m-mad-madness:

engineer—cat:

lumoblaze:

jonkakes:

bigcoolscorner:

merauderdon:

givemeinternet:

As close as you will ever be to a nuclear explosion

THIS IS FUCKING TERRIFYING

No thank you.

The columns of smoke in the foreground are telephone poles boiling

This is way cooler to look at than it should be

Science side of Tumblr would like to add:
Heat is generally transmitted in 3 forms: conduction, convection, radiation.
The fact that the telephone poles and wires are boiling away well before the shockwave hits them indicates that the heat from the explosion has not reached them by convection (much slower than the speed of sound) or by conduction (at best, comparable to the speed of sound), but purely by radiation. In other words: the explosion is bright enough to boil everything.


reblogging again for what engineer—cat said

stammsternenstaub:

m-m-mad-madness:

engineer—cat:

lumoblaze:

jonkakes:

bigcoolscorner:

merauderdon:

givemeinternet:

As close as you will ever be to a nuclear explosion

THIS IS FUCKING TERRIFYING

No thank you.

The columns of smoke in the foreground are telephone poles boiling

This is way cooler to look at than it should be

Science side of Tumblr would like to add:

Heat is generally transmitted in 3 forms: conduction, convection, radiation.

The fact that the telephone poles and wires are boiling away well before the shockwave hits them indicates that the heat from the explosion has not reached them by convection (much slower than the speed of sound) or by conduction (at best, comparable to the speed of sound), but purely by radiation. In other words: the explosion is bright enough to boil everything.

reblogging again for what engineer—cat said

(via lulubleurk)

— 6 hours ago with 434142 notes

queenmerbabe:

dogsinmethlabs:

Lord give me strength.

men are trash

(via bulbeuse)

— 12 hours ago with 117147 notes